|
|
Post by thediff on Apr 13, 2004 16:51:48 GMT -5
Hey does any one out there have real life knowledge of the riding differences betweem an At and Rx?
ie speed
Larry
|
|
|
|
Post by Robin Parkes on May 16, 2004 10:06:51 GMT -5
Larry, I read a road test of the RX about two years ago and the writer considered it comfortable if a bit slower than a conventional bike. I would have thought that there would be no difference between the RX and the AT except for the drivetrain, which may shave a pound off the overall weight. It's the price difference I wouldn't like. The AT was £300 more than the CT so I went for the CT. I'm sorry now for some of our roads have a dressing of gravel in bitumen, which makes for a very rough ride.  Regards, Robin. |
|
|
|
Post by brokenleg on May 24, 2004 17:59:53 GMT -5
Yes I have booth but have not been able to ride had opration in januray that was suposed to fix my leg but did not work. Made worse will go back under the knife june 2 and be off my leg 26weeks. please tell Robin if she is the lady I talked to last year from Ireland I said hello from NC. Cold mot ride bikes all I could do is look at them and get fat I have and AT for my wife and I have an RX still new very dusty need to cover with sheet. When I get to ride again I will give you a report.
|
|
